<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New Zealand study examines abortion and mental health link	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2008/11/30/new-zealand-study-examines-abortion-and-mental-health-link/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2008/11/30/new-zealand-study-examines-abortion-and-mental-health-link/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:32:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Patrick		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2008/11/30/new-zealand-study-examines-abortion-and-mental-health-link/#comment-24188</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com/?p=2488#comment-24188</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Okay Table 2 of the study is a little odd.
In the 5 year lag model the RRs (risk ratios) are:
1.32 (Abortion)
1.06 (Pregnancy Loss)
1.05 (unwanted pregnancy - live birth)
1.22 (no adverse reaction - live birth)
Yes the abortion group shows a 32% increase overall in mental health problems, but the group that decided not to have an abortion shows a 22% increase in mental health problems - and this in the group that had no adverse reaction to being pregnant.  Oddly the group that didn&#039;t want to be pregnant - but had the baby anyway - did significantly better in mental health outcomes.
That leads me to wonder if the unwanted preganancy-livebirth group isn&#039;t very representative.
And if we are to believe table 2 - we would have to conclude that motherhood isn&#039;t the greatest thing for mental health either.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay Table 2 of the study is a little odd.<br />
In the 5 year lag model the RRs (risk ratios) are:<br />
1.32 (Abortion)<br />
1.06 (Pregnancy Loss)<br />
1.05 (unwanted pregnancy &#8211; live birth)<br />
1.22 (no adverse reaction &#8211; live birth)<br />
Yes the abortion group shows a 32% increase overall in mental health problems, but the group that decided not to have an abortion shows a 22% increase in mental health problems &#8211; and this in the group that had no adverse reaction to being pregnant.  Oddly the group that didn&#8217;t want to be pregnant &#8211; but had the baby anyway &#8211; did significantly better in mental health outcomes.<br />
That leads me to wonder if the unwanted preganancy-livebirth group isn&#8217;t very representative.<br />
And if we are to believe table 2 &#8211; we would have to conclude that motherhood isn&#8217;t the greatest thing for mental health either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
