<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Factcheck.org on Obama&#039;s opposition to the Born Alive Infant Protection Act	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2008/08/27/factcheckorg-on-obamas-opposition-to-the-born-alive-infant-protection-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2008/08/27/factcheckorg-on-obamas-opposition-to-the-born-alive-infant-protection-act/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:31:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Warren		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2008/08/27/factcheckorg-on-obamas-opposition-to-the-born-alive-infant-protection-act/#comment-19073</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//?p=1125#comment-19073</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lynn David - You threw me off there. I thought you were going to say that respecting life as a mystery that begins at conception preserves the wonder. I do not see how Obama&#039;s viability position does anything but respect (yea, reverences) Roe v Wade.
I recall being in Intro to Psychology studying fetal development and wondering why there was any question about the matter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynn David &#8211; You threw me off there. I thought you were going to say that respecting life as a mystery that begins at conception preserves the wonder. I do not see how Obama&#8217;s viability position does anything but respect (yea, reverences) Roe v Wade.<br />
I recall being in Intro to Psychology studying fetal development and wondering why there was any question about the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lynn David		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2008/08/27/factcheckorg-on-obamas-opposition-to-the-born-alive-infant-protection-act/#comment-19072</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lynn David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//?p=1125#comment-19072</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just wondering, Warren.   Purely as a psychologist is that question also above your pay grade?   Certainly as a human it is not, because your religious beliefs intervene on the side of conception.
Now I have a gut reaction in that respect, one that I think would fit with the idea of psychology (isn&#039;t that what drives us psychologically speaking anyway?).   And that is that once a woman has felt her unborn child kick, I could not were I female allow the death of that child (happens to coincide with the Muslim idea circa the 12th week).   But then I&#039;m a gay atheist (though a spiritual atheist, go figure what that means) who probably doesn&#039;t get a say in such things.
But all in all, I &lt;em&gt;wonder&lt;/em&gt; if the dogmatic answer that human life deserving of rights begins at conception isn&#039;t a matter of destroying that spirtuality (aka &lt;em&gt;wonder)&lt;/em&gt; about the matter that humans should feel for themselves and then truly express with their choice.   And I think that is where Obama&#039;s opinion lies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering, Warren.   Purely as a psychologist is that question also above your pay grade?   Certainly as a human it is not, because your religious beliefs intervene on the side of conception.<br />
Now I have a gut reaction in that respect, one that I think would fit with the idea of psychology (isn&#8217;t that what drives us psychologically speaking anyway?).   And that is that once a woman has felt her unborn child kick, I could not were I female allow the death of that child (happens to coincide with the Muslim idea circa the 12th week).   But then I&#8217;m a gay atheist (though a spiritual atheist, go figure what that means) who probably doesn&#8217;t get a say in such things.<br />
But all in all, I <em>wonder</em> if the dogmatic answer that human life deserving of rights begins at conception isn&#8217;t a matter of destroying that spirtuality (aka <em>wonder)</em> about the matter that humans should feel for themselves and then truly express with their choice.   And I think that is where Obama&#8217;s opinion lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
