Maybe I’m a little slow. Are you saying that you know a researcher that I can fire a question to in e-mail?

But the other items in your list don’t always show up as well.

To be honest I’m not sure if that is accurate. I think those show up every time in any sort of broad sample.

In ten years if we’re still posting on this board that list is going to be much bigger. Heck, the whole thing could be figured out by then. Somebody is bound to inject gay sheep with the juice that turned bi fruit fly’s straight. If it works in sheep the whole mystery is over.

Ya know, I thought about the Fraternal Birth Order Effect but didn’t include it only because sometimes it doesn’t show up.

But the other items in your list don’t always show up as well. I just thought that was worth pointing out – its a good list though 🙂 It might also be worthwhile to mention that your list only shows us what we currently know – or think we know 🙂

I never suggested that we didn’t have clues – I believe if you re-read my post you will see that I said that scientists are currently following many of those clues that point to a genetic component for homosexuality 🙂

Ya know, I thought about the Fraternal Birth Order Effect but didn’t include it only because sometimes it doesn’t show up. But you are right. I can see why it could be considered a good clue. Researchers find it often enough that if I had to flip a coin I’d guess there is something to it.