Comments on: New blog format: What about it?

By: Warren

Warren — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:15:05 +0000

Ann you are correct. Byron, I guess Paul is not Weboverlord after all. It is written, thou canst not be a weboverlord with a capital A.

By: Ann

Ann — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:56:16 +0000

not sure but I think the “A” in the word “And” should not be capitalized 🙂

By: Byron

Byron — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:23:15 +0000

Weboverlord?

By: Evan

Evan — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:49:35 +0000

It’s so much better now with bigger font size for messages! It was a strain to the eye compared to the former layout.

Very interesting that you included “culture” in the slogan too.

By: jayhuck

jayhuck — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:24:22 +0000

I like it 🙂

By: Evan

Evan — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:41:57 +0000

Thanks, Ken. I tried that but it makes all fonts bigger, even those that already are big enough (it makes them too big). Thanks, though.

By: ken

ken — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:58:56 +0000

sorry, it should be CTRL+ and CTRL- the last post ate the CTRLs because I tried to get to fancy with the posting.

By: ken

ken — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:01:37 +0000

Another difference I just noticed is you don’t have comment numbers any more. Those where convenient to reference where you were quoting from (although not many people did that).

As far as smaller fonts, if you are using Firefox as your browser, you can increase the font size with + (- decreases).

By: Jim Phelan

Jim Phelan — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:44:31 +0000

Warren,

I do not see the edit button. -Jim

By: Evan

Evan — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:49:14 +0000

Not bad.. It’s better with tabs and two columns on the sides. Font size is smaller, which makes it more difficult to read than the former layout, that’s one minus I can see here. I’m looking forward to seeing the scientific review section. A section dedicated to online resources for fast reference would be a good idea. This blog debates very hot issues and people have to wade through tons of pages to find some particular references to important research.