<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mankind Project technique &#8211; &#8220;Bucketing,&#8221; Part One	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/12/03/mankind-project-technique-bucketing-part-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/12/03/mankind-project-technique-bucketing-part-one/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:12:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Blakeslee		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/12/03/mankind-project-technique-bucketing-part-one/#comment-66870</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Blakeslee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2007/12/03/mankind-project-technique-bucketing-part-one/#comment-66870</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Looks about right...I agree that this has limited benefit in the hands of a therapist.  Useful in uncovering reactivity to someone else due to projection.  Hardly scientific (the facilitators stuff could get in the middle of the process) also screening the participant for likelihood of suggestability or negative regression does not occur.



Most therapists are trained to withhold their biases from the therapuetic process as well as asses clients for their ability to engage in various therapeutic processes without adverse reactions.



Hard to give informed consent as a participant in MKP weekend...you can give consent, but not informed consent since you don&#039;t know the risks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks about right&#8230;I agree that this has limited benefit in the hands of a therapist.  Useful in uncovering reactivity to someone else due to projection.  Hardly scientific (the facilitators stuff could get in the middle of the process) also screening the participant for likelihood of suggestability or negative regression does not occur.</p>
<p>Most therapists are trained to withhold their biases from the therapuetic process as well as asses clients for their ability to engage in various therapeutic processes without adverse reactions.</p>
<p>Hard to give informed consent as a participant in MKP weekend&#8230;you can give consent, but not informed consent since you don&#8217;t know the risks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
