I think you may have made an error here:

“I think *all* of the unisex public or institutional toilets have been connected to sex crime of some description, voyeurism or child pornography, those that exist (in schools) now have matrons in some cases etc.”

Please support your statement with some research that all of the unisex public bathrooms have been connected to a sex crime.

When you exaggerate to this extent, it is hard to believe anything else written. Please be careful in your statements.

Cameras in bathrooms is an entirely different issue to transsexual use of restrooms…I’m also not sure of this connection.

The United Kingdom I can do.

I think *all* of the unisex public or institutional toilets have been connected to sex crime of some description, voyeurism or child pornography, those that exist (in schools) now have matrons in some cases etc.

However in Great Britain very little of that will send anybody to jail. In countries which routinely imprison pedophiles it might obviously be a little different. It must surely have some effect.

Also, in the UK placing a secret camera in a girls toilet is not in itelf illegal. So it is quite common in schools and other places, original photography of schoolgirls in toilets or taking ink out of blouses etc., can be sold in Japan for a lot of cash.

In the UK the number of males associated with U18 pornography is 2.4 millions.

That was before child pornography was criminalized via the SOA 2003. Child pornography web-site usaage, is about 800,000. The Brits use to produce a lot of child pornography for export.

I organized vents in Berlin when the Stasi ran the the ‘other’ place, the ‘bring a shovel’ parties over the wall were 1920s hedonism on a tight budget.

I have to say that this local authority has completely me out-done in strangeness.

I was prepared to go to a gulag for a joke, for fun, for something that was rationed, freedom, not the liberty to flash my penis in the park, or to scare women. I think these politicians are betraying America.

With respect I don’t think MC has stereotypical ideas on gender appropriate dress, they are a radical thinking organization and I am not aware that beards have to be shaved or dresses worn etc.

Obviously anybody will have a free pass to peek, but that would appear to be the price to be paid to protect whatever it is they are protecting.

I am not being vague on the last point, they simply don’t know, they are apparently wide open on the definition front.

They are famous now, which is of course precisely what they wanted.

Please see profiles and stats on criminals and their geographic area of incident. You will be surprised to find out what people do to “get away with it”. What you “imagine” is not what the criminal imagines.