Comments on: Montgomery County, MD votes tomorrow on gender identity ordinance

By: Just Jennifer

Just Jennifer — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:56:01 +0000

I know this is a bit late, but I live in San Francisco, and I can comment a bit on what that law means. Here it means that if there is inevitable, and unavoidable nudity and the facility cannot easily correct the problem, they have to provide equal accomodations for transgender people. Otherwise, they have to insure that their is sufficient privacy that there is not a problem.

By: jag

jag — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:38:21 +0000

Mary…you commented:

““Most transgendered people are reasonable….”

Most people are reasonable.”

Thank you for stating the obvious, that transgendered people are people just like everybody else.

By: Mary

Mary — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:13:24 +0000

“Most transgendered people are reasonable….”

Most people are reasonable.

By: Timothy Kincaid

Timothy Kincaid — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:59:31 +0000

Assuming that someone will take advantage of an ambiguous law is reality.

Kindly provide for me an example of this occuring somewhere in the 14 or so states that currently have transgender non-discrimination policies.

By: Mary

Mary — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:50:59 +0000

Ken,

Assuming that someone will take advantage of an ambiguous law is reality. Transitional (not full transgendered) and intersexed people should probably have a separate restroom, locker room, etc..