<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Christian Post reports on changing focus	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/06/19/christian-post-reports-on-changing-focus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/06/19/christian-post-reports-on-changing-focus/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:27:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Timothy Kincaid		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/06/19/christian-post-reports-on-changing-focus/#comment-5721</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Kincaid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2007/06/19/christian-post-reports-on-changing-focus/#comment-5721</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I gave up and deconverted about a year and a half ago, but not after a 35 year fight as a believer. &lt;/i&gt;



I was never ex-gay.  So if there is anyone who wonders why this movement inspires such passion in me, read Paul&#039;s opening paragraph.



I&#039;m not a super-religious guy.  I&#039;m not very holy and I don&#039;t always live the way I think I should.  I&#039;m not one of those &quot;good morning, praise God, isn&#039;t this a great day the lord has made&quot; kinda guys.  My prayer is private, my devotions are quiet and I don&#039;t wear my faith on my sleeve.



But it brings me to tears to see Christianity - and the ex-gay ministry in particular - drive people from God.  It is this whole either-or dichotomy that is set up: this insistance that you cannot be gay and be a Christian.  It permiates the language of the ex-gay movement.  It is seeded in the media by ex-gay leaders.



And it leads to good decent people who want a relationship with God giving up, rejecting God, turning away, all because they feel that they have to.  NO.. it&#039;s because they are TOLD they have to - to please God they have to be other than the way he made them.



And I hate it.  And it&#039;s wrong.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I gave up and deconverted about a year and a half ago, but not after a 35 year fight as a believer. </i></p>
<p>I was never ex-gay.  So if there is anyone who wonders why this movement inspires such passion in me, read Paul&#8217;s opening paragraph.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a super-religious guy.  I&#8217;m not very holy and I don&#8217;t always live the way I think I should.  I&#8217;m not one of those &#8220;good morning, praise God, isn&#8217;t this a great day the lord has made&#8221; kinda guys.  My prayer is private, my devotions are quiet and I don&#8217;t wear my faith on my sleeve.</p>
<p>But it brings me to tears to see Christianity &#8211; and the ex-gay ministry in particular &#8211; drive people from God.  It is this whole either-or dichotomy that is set up: this insistance that you cannot be gay and be a Christian.  It permiates the language of the ex-gay movement.  It is seeded in the media by ex-gay leaders.</p>
<p>And it leads to good decent people who want a relationship with God giving up, rejecting God, turning away, all because they feel that they have to.  NO.. it&#8217;s because they are TOLD they have to &#8211; to please God they have to be other than the way he made them.</p>
<p>And I hate it.  And it&#8217;s wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: paul		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/06/19/christian-post-reports-on-changing-focus/#comment-5720</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2007/06/19/christian-post-reports-on-changing-focus/#comment-5720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I gave up and deconverted about a year and a half ago, but not after a 35 year fight as a believer.



Warren quotes the &quot;through a glass darkly&quot; scripture, which I held as a favorite before my swan song.  The rest of the scripture, I think, being equally important to include...&quot;now, these three remain, faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.&quot;



Paul juxtaposes &quot;faith, hope and love&quot; ( Love being Jesus&#039; favorite command?) with what has today become two major fundamental Christian divisions.  Those who (instead?) follow &quot;knowledge&quot; (strict bible literalists?), and those who are more esoteric and &#039;follow&#039; &quot;The Spirit&quot; (represented  by &quot;prohpesy&quot;).  By the scripture, neither of these are complete or absolute &quot;we know in part and we prophesy in part,&quot;  so the directive is to let faith, hope, and love dominate?  Which begs the question, what is it to love.  Yes, of course I&#039;ve read the whole chapter, but love cannot be a particular standard carved in stone any more than any other &quot;law&quot; of God.  How much more must love be &quot;written on the fleshy tables of the heart?&quot;  Many believers claim to actually be able to follow God, an actual being.  They speak of &quot;relationship&quot; with God/Jesus.  Indeed, that would seem pretty important in order to know what &quot;love&quot; is at any given point.  Is there really such a thing as a standard loving response in &#039;true&#039; Christiandom?



As regards ssa, why don&#039;t all true believers get together, like the apostles did when they were determining who would replace Judas, and just let God decide about ssa by &quot;drawing lots?&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave up and deconverted about a year and a half ago, but not after a 35 year fight as a believer.</p>
<p>Warren quotes the &#8220;through a glass darkly&#8221; scripture, which I held as a favorite before my swan song.  The rest of the scripture, I think, being equally important to include&#8230;&#8221;now, these three remain, faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.&#8221;</p>
<p>Paul juxtaposes &#8220;faith, hope and love&#8221; ( Love being Jesus&#8217; favorite command?) with what has today become two major fundamental Christian divisions.  Those who (instead?) follow &#8220;knowledge&#8221; (strict bible literalists?), and those who are more esoteric and &#8216;follow&#8217; &#8220;The Spirit&#8221; (represented  by &#8220;prohpesy&#8221;).  By the scripture, neither of these are complete or absolute &#8220;we know in part and we prophesy in part,&#8221;  so the directive is to let faith, hope, and love dominate?  Which begs the question, what is it to love.  Yes, of course I&#8217;ve read the whole chapter, but love cannot be a particular standard carved in stone any more than any other &#8220;law&#8221; of God.  How much more must love be &#8220;written on the fleshy tables of the heart?&#8221;  Many believers claim to actually be able to follow God, an actual being.  They speak of &#8220;relationship&#8221; with God/Jesus.  Indeed, that would seem pretty important in order to know what &#8220;love&#8221; is at any given point.  Is there really such a thing as a standard loving response in &#8216;true&#8217; Christiandom?</p>
<p>As regards ssa, why don&#8217;t all true believers get together, like the apostles did when they were determining who would replace Judas, and just let God decide about ssa by &#8220;drawing lots?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mary		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/06/19/christian-post-reports-on-changing-focus/#comment-5719</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 01:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2007/06/19/christian-post-reports-on-changing-focus/#comment-5719</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[or you&#039;re not good enough for God - which is harmful, too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or you&#8217;re not good enough for God &#8211; which is harmful, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Bussee		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/06/19/christian-post-reports-on-changing-focus/#comment-5718</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Bussee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 23:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2007/06/19/christian-post-reports-on-changing-focus/#comment-5718</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yup, Mary.  I agree.  Usually &quot;I believe&quot; folllowed by &quot;and YOU should believe&quot; ends in &quot;or I&#039;ll make you wish you did...&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, Mary.  I agree.  Usually &#8220;I believe&#8221; folllowed by &#8220;and YOU should believe&#8221; ends in &#8220;or I&#8217;ll make you wish you did&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mary		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/06/19/christian-post-reports-on-changing-focus/#comment-5717</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2007/06/19/christian-post-reports-on-changing-focus/#comment-5717</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Michael,

Very true.  Stick to statments of &quot;I believe.&quot;  Did you notice the period?  And try to avoid statments that start &quot;I believe you should believe...&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Very true.  Stick to statments of &#8220;I believe.&#8221;  Did you notice the period?  And try to avoid statments that start &#8220;I believe you should believe&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
