As for the few times he’s quoted Hoss in emails to you and others, oops! Goodness help us when scientists use historical quotes to illustrate what one’s own research is telling them (i.e. parasites, whatever).

As for “acceptable”, I’m not inside his mind, but it’s quite clear that he has never advoacted such a stance. You twist his words.

Society is legitimately concerned with health risks– they impact our taxes and everyone’s chances of illness and injury. Because we care about them, smokers are discouraged from smoking by higher insurance premiums, taxes on cigarettes and bans against smoking in public. These social pressures cause many to quit. They likewise encourage non-smokers to stay non-smokers.

Homosexuals are sexually troubled people engaging in dangerous activities. Because we care about them and those tempted to join them, it is important that we neither encourage nor legitimize such a destructive lifestyle.” – Medical Consequences of What Homosexuals Do

Notice the word “acceptable”. That doesn’t mean he doesn’t think it’s a good idea, just that he probably couldn’t get people to potically, ethically or socially endorse it. He certainly doesn’t say that he personally and religiously objects to the tatooing, imprisonment or slaughter of those he calls “”parasites”. The man is an evil hatemonger, plain and simple.