<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: NARTH adopts Leona Tyler Principle	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/02/10/narth-adopts-leona-tyler-principle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/02/10/narth-adopts-leona-tyler-principle/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:10:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Bussee		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/02/10/narth-adopts-leona-tyler-principle/#comment-3631</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Bussee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2007/02/10/narth-adopts-leona-tyler-principle/#comment-3631</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A real change would be for NARTH to accept responsibility for its mistakes and failures and stop blaming &quot;gay activists&quot; for the fact that they have no good science to back up their claims.  They have blamed &quot;gay activists&quot; for forcing the APA to remove homosexual as an illness.  They have blamed &quot;gay activists&quot; for the fact that they have not produced any good scientific studies.  The have blamed &quot;gay activists&quot; for wanting to &quot;silence them&quot; when articles by their own advisors (Berger and Schoenwolf) were widely criticized.

I bet they aslo blame the activists for their decision to shut down their blog.  What would be really nice would be a public apology for all of this blame-shifting.  Like Timothy, I am pessimistic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A real change would be for NARTH to accept responsibility for its mistakes and failures and stop blaming &#8220;gay activists&#8221; for the fact that they have no good science to back up their claims.  They have blamed &#8220;gay activists&#8221; for forcing the APA to remove homosexual as an illness.  They have blamed &#8220;gay activists&#8221; for the fact that they have not produced any good scientific studies.  The have blamed &#8220;gay activists&#8221; for wanting to &#8220;silence them&#8221; when articles by their own advisors (Berger and Schoenwolf) were widely criticized.</p>
<p>I bet they aslo blame the activists for their decision to shut down their blog.  What would be really nice would be a public apology for all of this blame-shifting.  Like Timothy, I am pessimistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Timothy Kincaid		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/02/10/narth-adopts-leona-tyler-principle/#comment-3630</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Kincaid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2007/02/10/narth-adopts-leona-tyler-principle/#comment-3630</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OK, I&#039;ll be the pessimist.



NARTH always claims that they are the ones who represent real science and that everyone else is just polically correct.  I don&#039;t predict much change.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;ll be the pessimist.</p>
<p>NARTH always claims that they are the ones who represent real science and that everyone else is just polically correct.  I don&#8217;t predict much change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Warren		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/02/10/narth-adopts-leona-tyler-principle/#comment-3629</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2007/02/10/narth-adopts-leona-tyler-principle/#comment-3629</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, I would respectfully say to those at NARTH that the website needs a makeover if they intend to follow the Tyler principle.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I would respectfully say to those at NARTH that the website needs a makeover if they intend to follow the Tyler principle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Bussee		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/02/10/narth-adopts-leona-tyler-principle/#comment-3628</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Bussee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2007/02/10/narth-adopts-leona-tyler-principle/#comment-3628</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think I&#039;ve got it!  Nicolosi OUT.  Blog DOWN.  Science IN.  Move that bus!  It&#039;s &quot;Extreme Makeover -- NARTH Edition&quot;!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ve got it!  Nicolosi OUT.  Blog DOWN.  Science IN.  Move that bus!  It&#8217;s &#8220;Extreme Makeover &#8212; NARTH Edition&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Burroway		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2007/02/10/narth-adopts-leona-tyler-principle/#comment-3627</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Burroway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2007/02/10/narth-adopts-leona-tyler-principle/#comment-3627</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s good to see NARTH formally adopt this principle some &lt;em&gt;34 years (!)&lt;/em&gt; after it became the official stance of the APA. I guess this simple ethical stance was controversial within NARTH?



Now, I&#039;ll be watching to see how NARTH implement&#039;s this principle. The devil is always in the details.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see NARTH formally adopt this principle some <em>34 years (!)</em> after it became the official stance of the APA. I guess this simple ethical stance was controversial within NARTH?</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;ll be watching to see how NARTH implement&#8217;s this principle. The devil is always in the details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
