If you believe “a Christian sexual ethic limits sexual behavior to monogamous heterosexual marriage. I don’t see being attracted as a sin,…” Then, do you believe in same-sex relationships being productive if the parties are allowed to marry – or if they are married (under canadian law, their church, etc..)?

It would seem to me that if they are following their faith (reconstructionist Methodist, etc..) which interprets the Bible differently under their Christian faith, then a married same-sex couple would simply have to follow the same Christian ethics regarding sexual behavior as anyone else.

How do you view this?

If it is true, it sounds similar to Dr. Throckmorton announcement that his “current work does not emphasize changing sexual orientation as much as it does achieving congruence with chosen beliefs and values (which may or may not lead to change of attractions). I do not want to misquote what Robbi reportedly said years ago.

Noe says on his site that he does not regret what he said and he still believes in change. I don’t see what Noe wrote as being a reason to retire the video.

Perhaps not. However it might be a good reason to change the title. Perhaps I Still Believe Others May Exist is available.

😉

Now if only EXODUS and NARTH would adopt a similar honest and realistic approach. I have enver objected to helping people live more loving, responsible, congruent and value-driven lives. That’s a worthy and “do-able” goal. And if, in the process of growing up, they discover some attractions they didn’t recognize before, that’s certainly OK with me.

Ck – I was aware of the statement and have it posted to the FAQs on this page. It will soon be a part of the I Do Exist website. Noe says on his site that he does not regret what he said and he still believes in change. I don’t see what Noe wrote as being a reason to retire the video.