<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Maryland Psychological Association joins APA in same-sex marriage brief	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/11/28/maryland-psychological-association-joins-apa-in-same-sex-marriage-brief/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/11/28/maryland-psychological-association-joins-apa-in-same-sex-marriage-brief/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:49:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Warren		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/11/28/maryland-psychological-association-joins-apa-in-same-sex-marriage-brief/#comment-2901</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2006/11/28/maryland-psychological-association-joins-apa-in-same-sex-marriage-brief/#comment-2901</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ken: The Amicus Brief is now linked in the post so you can find it there. As for the arguments against signing on, I do not have copies of letters or papers submitted. I favor professional neutrality on this issue and I suspect some argued in that way. Others probably argued that the research used to support same-sex marriage is weak. If I get any of those documents, I will post them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken: The Amicus Brief is now linked in the post so you can find it there. As for the arguments against signing on, I do not have copies of letters or papers submitted. I favor professional neutrality on this issue and I suspect some argued in that way. Others probably argued that the research used to support same-sex marriage is weak. If I get any of those documents, I will post them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ken		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/11/28/maryland-psychological-association-joins-apa-in-same-sex-marriage-brief/#comment-2900</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 06:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2006/11/28/maryland-psychological-association-joins-apa-in-same-sex-marriage-brief/#comment-2900</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can you get a copy (or a link to a copy)  of the brief?  Or at least the literature citations that where used?



I&#039;d also be interested in hearing what the arguments against signing on to the brief where.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you get a copy (or a link to a copy)  of the brief?  Or at least the literature citations that where used?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also be interested in hearing what the arguments against signing on to the brief where.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
