<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: LA Times reports on NARTH, Schoenewolf controversies	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/10/15/la-times-reports-on-narth-schoenewolf-controversies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/10/15/la-times-reports-on-narth-schoenewolf-controversies/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:15:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Warren		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/10/15/la-times-reports-on-narth-schoenewolf-controversies/#comment-2600</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2006/10/15/la-times-reports-on-narth-schoenewolf-controversies/#comment-2600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Boo is correct, he is listed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.narth.com/menus/advisors.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; here as a member&lt;/a&gt;. So is Joseph Berger, who also was involved in another controversy regarding an article on NARTH&#039;s website.



Dr. Schoenewolf&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.narth.com/docs/amok.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rebuttal&lt;/a&gt; is still up on the website. I am not sure how anyone would make sense of it since the original article has been taken down but it is there.



Beyond these observations, there is nothing new that I know about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boo is correct, he is listed <a href="http://www.narth.com/menus/advisors.html" rel="nofollow"> here as a member</a>. So is Joseph Berger, who also was involved in another controversy regarding an article on NARTH&#8217;s website.</p>
<p>Dr. Schoenewolf&#8217;s <a href="http://www.narth.com/docs/amok.html" rel="nofollow">rebuttal</a> is still up on the website. I am not sure how anyone would make sense of it since the original article has been taken down but it is there.</p>
<p>Beyond these observations, there is nothing new that I know about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Boo		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/10/15/la-times-reports-on-narth-schoenewolf-controversies/#comment-2599</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2006/10/15/la-times-reports-on-narth-schoenewolf-controversies/#comment-2599</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Their website still has him listed on the committee.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their website still has him listed on the committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/10/15/la-times-reports-on-narth-schoenewolf-controversies/#comment-2598</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 06:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2006/10/15/la-times-reports-on-narth-schoenewolf-controversies/#comment-2598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dr. Throckmorton, do you have any updates on this situation? Is Schoenewolf still a member of NARTH&#039;s Scientific Committee?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Throckmorton, do you have any updates on this situation? Is Schoenewolf still a member of NARTH&#8217;s Scientific Committee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/10/15/la-times-reports-on-narth-schoenewolf-controversies/#comment-2597</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2006/10/15/la-times-reports-on-narth-schoenewolf-controversies/#comment-2597</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is from the Agape Press article:

(The Schoenewolf controversy) &quot;has battered the so-called &#039;ex-gay&#039; movement with accusations of racial bigotry for the first time.&quot; This firestorm has resulted, the report suggests, partly because ex-homosexual movement leaders and their Christian conservative allies have failed to condemn Schoenewolf&#039;s inflammatory remarks.&quot;

I think this is a reference to Alan Chambers, EXODUS and Focus on the Family.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is from the Agape Press article:</p>
<p>(The Schoenewolf controversy) &#8220;has battered the so-called &#8216;ex-gay&#8217; movement with accusations of racial bigotry for the first time.&#8221; This firestorm has resulted, the report suggests, partly because ex-homosexual movement leaders and their Christian conservative allies have failed to condemn Schoenewolf&#8217;s inflammatory remarks.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think this is a reference to Alan Chambers, EXODUS and Focus on the Family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/10/15/la-times-reports-on-narth-schoenewolf-controversies/#comment-2596</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 05:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2006/10/15/la-times-reports-on-narth-schoenewolf-controversies/#comment-2596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, I guess NARTH is going to dodge and weave. I suppose they think it will go away.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess NARTH is going to dodge and weave. I suppose they think it will go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
