Comments on: NARTH regrets the Schoenewolf “comments…misconstrued”

By: Robbi Kenney

Robbi Kenney — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:59:00 +0000

Oh, Lord. Alan said THAT on NPR? Guess I’ll put my EXODUS ex-president hat on and go over there and give him a little consult.

By: Boo

Boo — Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:11:00 +0000

Maybe Alan Chambers will soon be claiming that his recent claim on NPR’s Fresh Air that most gay people don’t want equal rights was also misconstrued.

By: Timothy Kincaid

Timothy Kincaid — Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:14:00 +0000

The SPLC has the posting date of the article wrong also: “Schoenewolf’s essay first appeared on NARTH’s website in the fall of 2005”

Unless I’m miscontruing the date at the bottom of the NARTH page, the Schoenewolf article was posted (or most recently revised) on April 5, 2005.

By: Michael Bussee

Michael Bussee — Sun, 08 Oct 2006 18:01:00 +0000

From NARTH’s “apology”:

“It should go without saying that we do not wish to minimize the suffering of those who have been mistreated because of race, sex, religious beliefs or sexual orientation.”

Yeah, it SHOULD go without saying, but NARTH keeps advsiors on their “expert panel” who continue to minimize these very things.

By: Throckmorton

Throckmorton — Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:51:00 +0000

The SPL Center article does not make it appear the Dr. Schoenewolf’s meanings were misconstrued. He doesn’t change anything. Perhaps, I misconstrued the SPL Center article. Then again, maybe I didn’t.