Comments on: Palm Springs Unity Rally Website Gets It Wrong

By: Boo

Boo — Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:14:00 +0000

Having a philosophical preference for male-female parenting does not lead to a conclusion that gay parents should be viewed any differently by schools (or anybody else for that matter).

Are you saying this is your position and you disagree with the article, or are you saying this is the article’s position, which it clearly isn’t? Not trying to nitpick, but you’ve confused me a lil.

“Building Family Equality in the Classroom” suggests parents attend the first PTA meeting together and introduce themselves as a couple.

Barbara McPherson, legislative affairs coordinator for the California Family Council, told Family News in Focus such activism doesn’t belong in school.

Say ye yea or say ye nay?

By: Throckmorton

Throckmorton — Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:35:00 +0000

Having a philosophical preference for male-female parenting does not lead to a conclusion that gay parents should be viewed any differently by schools (or anybody else for that matter).

By: Boo

Boo — Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:49:00 +0000

Furthermore, I fully support FOTF and LWO’s efforts to articulate a conservative Christian view of sexual ethics.

Do you support FOTF’s contention that if gay parents go to their children’s school as a couple and engage in the same kind of involvement any straight parents would normally be expected to, it should be considered “activism”?

http://www.family.org/cforum/news/a0042003.cfm

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:44:00 +0000

I would not be a member of, give an address to, or be a guest speaker for an organization that publishes articles by men who advocate views like Berger or Schonewolf, any more than I would be a guest speaker for NAMBLA.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:20:00 +0000

Membership in an organization does not imply agreement with all its positions or statements. That is a very simplistic notion.

It is a common error we all must be careful to avoid.

David Blakeslee