<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Borndifferent.com	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/07/13/borndifferentcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/07/13/borndifferentcom/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 11:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Throckmorton		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/07/13/borndifferentcom/#comment-1684</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Throckmorton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 11:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2006/07/13/borndifferentcom/#comment-1684</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Craig: What is a choice?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig: What is a choice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Craig		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/07/13/borndifferentcom/#comment-1683</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 08:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2006/07/13/borndifferentcom/#comment-1683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The website must have freshman high school kids presenting their argument, if you can call it that.  The debate of if you are born gay is ridiculus and detremental.  If we were born gay, then wouldn&#039;t we be able to tell by a certain gene?  What&#039;s keeping society from killing unborn gays?

Their website claims that being gay is natural, as with the penguins.  Even if it is proved, nature has animals that eat their young, eat their mates, and eat each other.  We in our society do not accept that type of behavior form the &quot;natural&quot; world.

What if we are born gay and we don&#039;t want to be.  According to the website, it would be detrimental to change from your born gayness.

Yes, the ADA, APA, and others say it is not a disorder, but they also do not say it is not a choice, which I beleive it is.

30% of the population is gay according to the website.  That means that if I stand in a crowd of 1000 people, 300 are gay.  I find that statistic extremly unbelievable.

The website has poor arguments for their agenda and clearly know nothing about the subject they are talking about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The website must have freshman high school kids presenting their argument, if you can call it that.  The debate of if you are born gay is ridiculus and detremental.  If we were born gay, then wouldn&#8217;t we be able to tell by a certain gene?  What&#8217;s keeping society from killing unborn gays?</p>
<p>Their website claims that being gay is natural, as with the penguins.  Even if it is proved, nature has animals that eat their young, eat their mates, and eat each other.  We in our society do not accept that type of behavior form the &#8220;natural&#8221; world.</p>
<p>What if we are born gay and we don&#8217;t want to be.  According to the website, it would be detrimental to change from your born gayness.</p>
<p>Yes, the ADA, APA, and others say it is not a disorder, but they also do not say it is not a choice, which I beleive it is.</p>
<p>30% of the population is gay according to the website.  That means that if I stand in a crowd of 1000 people, 300 are gay.  I find that statistic extremly unbelievable.</p>
<p>The website has poor arguments for their agenda and clearly know nothing about the subject they are talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: grantdale		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/07/13/borndifferentcom/#comment-1682</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grantdale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 03:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2006/07/13/borndifferentcom/#comment-1682</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh, OK -- makes more sense now. Sorry, the ref to 11% and 14% threw me and I went thinking for where that could have come from.

Leaving aside the problem with the # of twins (ie 3 etc when the entire larger sample is whittled down): &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psych.northwestern.edu/psych/people/faculty/bailey/Publications/Bailey%20et%20al.%20twins,2000.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bailey&lt;/A&gt; reported MZ probandwise concordance at 20% (under &quot;Strict&quot; criterea) or 38% under more lenient. (Table 1, Males)

I realise now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drthrockmorton.com/article.asp?id=27&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;where you got&lt;/A&gt; the 11% (3/27), but that&#039;s not the probandwise concordance rate reported by Bailey(2000).

Which, of course, left me more confused than a naked bisexual penguin surrounded by a bunch of equally not-clothed guys. With or without the igloo.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, OK &#8212; makes more sense now. Sorry, the ref to 11% and 14% threw me and I went thinking for where that could have come from.</p>
<p>Leaving aside the problem with the # of twins (ie 3 etc when the entire larger sample is whittled down): <a href="http://www.psych.northwestern.edu/psych/people/faculty/bailey/Publications/Bailey%20et%20al.%20twins,2000.pdf" rel="nofollow">Bailey</a> reported MZ probandwise concordance at 20% (under &#8220;Strict&#8221; criterea) or 38% under more lenient. (Table 1, Males)</p>
<p>I realise now <a href="http://www.drthrockmorton.com/article.asp?id=27" rel="nofollow">where you got</a> the 11% (3/27), but that&#8217;s not the probandwise concordance rate reported by Bailey(2000).</p>
<p>Which, of course, left me more confused than a naked bisexual penguin surrounded by a bunch of equally not-clothed guys. With or without the igloo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/07/13/borndifferentcom/#comment-1681</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2006/07/13/borndifferentcom/#comment-1681</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree that &quot;genetics plays a part&quot; does not logically equate to &quot;some people are born gay&quot;.

Additionally, I don&#039;t think the research on twin studies is nearly as black and white as borndifferent would have us believe.

However, the cumulative work and observations on sexual orientation pretty clearly shows that there is some biological input involved in the determination of orientation in some gay men.  The chromosome observation and the recent younger brother study give support to that.

I think it can be agreed that some men are pre-nataly impacted in ways that are likely - all other things being equal - to result in a sexual orientation based on same sex attraction.  We may disagree on whether or not early detection of indicators and immediate and concentrated efforts may result in another orientation.  But current research tells us that absent these concerted efforts, some of these men will be gay.

I don&#039;t think it dishonest, deceptive, or even overly simplistic to shorthand that as &quot;some people are born gay&quot;.

Perhaps the website should provide a more detailed explanation.

Timothy Kincaid

ps

Ever hear a dog say &quot;moo&quot;?
I know one that does, do you?
If you knew Norman, you would too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that &#8220;genetics plays a part&#8221; does not logically equate to &#8220;some people are born gay&#8221;.</p>
<p>Additionally, I don&#8217;t think the research on twin studies is nearly as black and white as borndifferent would have us believe.</p>
<p>However, the cumulative work and observations on sexual orientation pretty clearly shows that there is some biological input involved in the determination of orientation in some gay men.  The chromosome observation and the recent younger brother study give support to that.</p>
<p>I think it can be agreed that some men are pre-nataly impacted in ways that are likely &#8211; all other things being equal &#8211; to result in a sexual orientation based on same sex attraction.  We may disagree on whether or not early detection of indicators and immediate and concentrated efforts may result in another orientation.  But current research tells us that absent these concerted efforts, some of these men will be gay.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it dishonest, deceptive, or even overly simplistic to shorthand that as &#8220;some people are born gay&#8221;.</p>
<p>Perhaps the website should provide a more detailed explanation.</p>
<p>Timothy Kincaid</p>
<p>ps</p>
<p>Ever hear a dog say &#8220;moo&#8221;?<br />
I know one that does, do you?<br />
If you knew Norman, you would too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Throckmorton		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/07/13/borndifferentcom/#comment-1680</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Throckmorton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 06:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2006/07/13/borndifferentcom/#comment-1680</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nope, I mean the 2000 Bailey study from your stomping grounds. Pairwise concordances.

My understanding about Silo is that he attended a New Waddlers Weekend event. Sitting naked in an igloo with other naked penguins (I guess they lost the chinstrap) did the trick.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, I mean the 2000 Bailey study from your stomping grounds. Pairwise concordances.</p>
<p>My understanding about Silo is that he attended a New Waddlers Weekend event. Sitting naked in an igloo with other naked penguins (I guess they lost the chinstrap) did the trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
