<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Science behind the stereotypes?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/04/07/science-behind-the-stereotypes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/04/07/science-behind-the-stereotypes/</link>
	<description>A [retired] college psychology professor&#039;s observations about public policy, mental health, sexual identity, and religious issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 06:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Boo		</title>
		<link>https://wthrockmorton.com/2006/04/07/science-behind-the-stereotypes/#comment-1272</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 06:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.wthrockmorton.com//2006/04/07/science-behind-the-stereotypes/#comment-1272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The main flaw I could see is that they didn&#039;t note that Reiger&#039;s study likely had severe problems with selection bias. People who recalled more gender atypicality would probably be more likely to send in videos, and Reiger apparently had a lot of problems recruiting people for the study because of his advisor&#039;s wacky eugenics ideas:

http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/NU%20seminar%204-28-05.htm#Sanders

http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Chicago%20Free%20Press%205-04-05.htm

I knew an incredibly effeminate guy in college who, I was informed, &quot;pulls in girls like a f[-----]g rake.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main flaw I could see is that they didn&#8217;t note that Reiger&#8217;s study likely had severe problems with selection bias. People who recalled more gender atypicality would probably be more likely to send in videos, and Reiger apparently had a lot of problems recruiting people for the study because of his advisor&#8217;s wacky eugenics ideas:</p>
<p><a href="http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/NU%20seminar%204-28-05.htm#Sanders" rel="nofollow ugc">http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/NU%20seminar%204-28-05.htm#Sanders</a></p>
<p><a href="http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Chicago%20Free%20Press%205-04-05.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Chicago%20Free%20Press%205-04-05.htm</a></p>
<p>I knew an incredibly effeminate guy in college who, I was informed, &#8220;pulls in girls like a f[&#8212;&#8211;]g rake.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
