Do you have any evidence that Kinsey was a quack? Apart from Reisman that is…

I tend to see him as an explorer. He was (in recent timeline) the first to bother asking, instead of speculating. He tabulated the data, instead of merely writing a moralistic ersion of the way the World should be. This, in 1948, was a major breakthrough (as was, his scale; as a way of conceptualizing sexuality). His interviewing techniques were radical for the day, but are now the standard approach.

Knowing — at least — that America is “to the East” is a big help to those that follow.

It is also fascinating that his estimate of 4% of the male population… has been (largely) confirmed time and time again.

Good guess? Or was he on to something?

I refuse to answer allegations of international drug smuggling, on the grounds that I am too frickin fabulous.

That’s why I mentioned the First was — apparently — needed to clarify how those noble sentiments may be achieved.

Amendments always refer back to something. Kind of like, well, durh 🙂

And ah-ha! I see you too have been to the Judith Reisman School of Writing, but not yet graduated.

In the final few classes it will be revealed that the simple putting of “?” on the end of an outrageous lie makes it… a question, not slander.

“The question needs to be answered. Is Boo, in fact, really an international drug-runner? So far she has never given a straight answer to that question, and as a concerned parent I have a right to know.”

BTW — and not unrelated — has anyone ever read the Constitution of the former Soviet Union? As a promise note, it was magnificent. Chock full of all sorts of wonderful verbage about freedom, liberty and rights.

Discuss: “But not worth the paper it was written on because?” (50 words or less)

The First, apparently, was needed to help spell that out in the U.S.”

You’re thinking of the Preamble to the Constitution, not the First Amednment. I think.

Point being, nobody in the US has to worry about anyone taking away our sacred right to anti-gay speech.

BTW, did you know that Dr. Throckmorton once shot a man just to watch him die? It’s true. And by “it’s true” I mean “it’s false.” It’s a lie. A horrible, filthy, non-Constitutionally-protected lie.

Boo